These frustrated scientists want to leave the United States — do you? Take Nature’s poll

Some scientists in the United States have told Nature that they are considering leaving the country in the wake of widespread disruption to research brought in by the administration of US President Donald Trump. The researchers say they are looking for opportunities in Europe, Australia and Asia.
Since Trump took office in January, his administration has cut thousands of jobs at key public-health and science agencies, frozen biomedical research funding, slashed money to cover research-overhead costs and terminated grants that don’t align with the administration’s priorities. The effects of these changes have been felt by researchers across the United States and abroad.
“I’ve been really, really passionate about my work, but the situation in the US is so stressful,” says a postdoctoral researcher who studies cancer and genomics at a prestigious US institution, and who requested anonymity because she did not have permission to speak to the media. The researcher is from South Asia but has spent the past four years in the United States, and is now talking to colleagues in Europe about opportunities. As someone who is not a US citizen, she is worried about media reports describing the Trump administration’s plans to introduce travel bans affecting specific countries.
Are you a researcher in the United States who is contemplating leaving the country? Are you making plans? We want to hear from you.
Madhukar Pai, a tuberculosis researcher at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, says that US colleagues have been in touch looking for work, or wanting to talk. “The distress is very palpable and sad to see,” he says.
Ready to go
A prominent infectious-diseases researcher, who is a dual national of the United States and a European Union member state, intends to move back to Europe in the coming months. This is the first time in the decade and a half since he moved to the United States that he is seriously considering job offers from colleagues across the Atlantic. “There is the case to stay and fight”, but “I have to consider what is the best decision for myself, my family, my lab, my research and my mental health”, says the researcher, who wants to remain anonymous because his plans are not finalized and to protect his team.
He says his reasons for leaving include the Trump administration’s anti-science rhetoric and leadership changes at major government agencies. He also worries about the future of funding in his field of infectious diseases and virology.
Leaving the United States will require compromises, he says. Salaries in Europe are generally lower than those for researchers with his experience in the United States, and the research environment in Europe can be less interdisciplinary, he says. Funding for science across Europe also remains stagnant. But having the option to leave puts him in an “extremely privileged position”, he adds.
Tough job market
You Might Also Like
Quantum entanglement as a tool to image distant astronomical objects
RESEARCH BRIEFINGS 11 March 2026 Particles entangled over long distances can, in theory, improve the sensitivity of long-baseline interferometers that...
Monthly HIV-drug injections offer potent alternative to daily tablets
Nature, Published online: 08 March 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-00669-8Long-lasting treatment suppresses HIV in people with mental illness and other conditions that make...
High-rise transistors can be used to build space-saving circuits
NEWS AND VIEWS 05 March 2026 Logical circuits have been built from nanosheet stacks of various transistors, which could make...
meet the female colleagues who inspire these award-winning women in science
Science was once the domain of researchers toiling in solitude. Today, however, research thrives through collaboration, and is perhaps at...







