In the U.S., AI-generated creations — books, movies, and so forth— that have been edited by a human can likely be copyrighted, but those without any human modifications or additions cannot.
That’s according to a report published by the U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) on Wednesday, which outlined scenarios in which AI-generated content might be eligible for IP protections. Per the guidelines, a movie production house, for example, could copyright a film in which they used an AI tool to “de-age” actors or remove objects from a scene.
Prompts alone (e.g. “a sketch of a flower in springtime”) don’t usually produce works that can be copyrighted. But the USCO made clear in its report that copyright must be determined on a case-by-case basis.
The agency has yet to rule whether AI systems making “expressive,” independent artistic choices can produce copyrightable works. It plans to address this in a follow-up report due out in the coming months.
You Might Also Like
Minimalist Light Phone III launches March 27
Light, the maker of a minimalist phone designed to help consumers disconnect from smartphone distractions and social media, will launch...
Move over, Apple: Meet the alternative app stores coming to the EU
People in the European Union are now allowed to access alternative app stores thanks to the Digital Markets Act (DMA),...
Amazon is still hosting stalkerware victims’ data weeks after breach alert
Amazon will not say if it plans to take action against three phone surveillance apps that are storing troves of...
Waymo was slapped with nearly 600 parking tickets last year in SF alone
Waymo now has more than 300 driverless vehicles zipping passengers around San Francisco, but while they follow traffic laws, parking...